How should we shift the description from what a person 'can't' do to what they 'can' do?

How should we shift the description from what a person 'can't' do to what they 'can' do?

• A. By highlighting limitations only
• B. By focusing on what they can do and the tools they use to accomplish tasks, such as saying 'he uses a power chair'.
• C. By using clinical jargon
• D. By avoiding any mention of abilities.

Answer: (B)

Focusing on what someone can do and the tools that help them accomplish tasks is a strengths‑based, person‑centered way to describe their participation. It communicates both capability and the supports in place, which supports planning, independence, and dignity. For example, saying “he uses a power chair” shows what he can do (move around) and the assistive device that enables it, giving a clear, respectful picture of his functioning. The other options emphasize limitations, rely on jargon, or omit abilities, which can undermine motivation, understanding, and accessibility for the person and their family. So describing abilities and the supports or devices that aid them is the most helpful approach.

Focusing on what someone can do and the tools that help them accomplish tasks is a strengths‑based, person‑centered way to describe their participation. It communicates both capability and the supports in place, which supports planning, independence, and dignity. For example, saying “he uses a power chair” shows what he can do (move around) and the assistive device that enables it, giving a clear, respectful picture of his functioning. The other options emphasize limitations, rely on jargon, or omit abilities, which can undermine motivation, understanding, and accessibility for the person and their family. So describing abilities and the supports or devices that aid them is the most helpful approach.